Agentic SDLC - Agents build the software. Engineers own it.

Every engagement starts from the result, not a backlog. We write down what should change, for whom, and how we will both know it worked.

That short intent document is what everything after it is built and judged against.

Human gate: you sign off the intent before anything is built.

Agents turn the intent into a draft specification and design in one pass, instead of rounds of hand-offs, applying our standards and yours as they go.

People then do what agents should not: weigh trade-offs, question the brief, and change what needs changing.

Human gate: our engineers and designers review the specification with you and approve it.

Code is no longer the slow part. Engineers work from the approved plan and run several agent sessions in parallel, each on its own isolated branch.

The time that used to go into typing goes into steering, checking and deciding.

Human gate: an engineer steers every session and owns every change it produces.

Agents get the same feedback loops an engineer would: they run the tests, use the product in a browser and check their own work against the spec before a person looks at it.

So human review is spent where it counts: does this do what we agreed, and what could it break?

Human gate: a reviewer checks the change for intent and risk, not typos.

Every change arrives with the evidence that it works and a plain list of what it leaves out. A person reads both and decides whether it ships.

Each release can be traced back through review, plan and spec to the intent you signed.

Human gate: a person approves every release.

Once it is live, what production tells us becomes the next intent: a regression, a slow page, a request from your users.

The loop starts again, with the same written record behind it, so nothing depends on someone remembering why a decision was made.

Human gate: you agree which signals become the next piece of work.